|
Whether Bulldogs recognize them or not, we unfortunately suffered
setbacks in the Georgia-Georgia Tech series in 1943
(and the Jackets have the scoreboard to prove it) and 1944. |
The following is a piece I've posted before during previous Georgia-Georgia Tech game weeks. It's a stance – one of giving our hated rival to the southwest credit – I'm not proud of, but an opposing view I've supported for quite some time. Let me add that despite my opinion, I still
hate Tech!
Anyway, Happy Thanksgiving to all (... and even to those Yellow Jackets
out there).
I do not like The
Georgia Institute of Technology, and especially hate its football
team.
A few years ago, I somewhat respected
the Jackets for their sudden turnaround with the beginning of the Coach Paul Johnson era, but
now cherish the fact they've endured three consecutive seasons of five losses or more.
Unlike many decades ago, when I started
rooting for the Bulldogs in the early 1980s, I believe
many Dawg fans felt more sorry for Tech than those that disliked the Wramblin'
Wreck. "Hate" is a strong word and it was probably more reserved for the likes of Clemson, Auburn, and maybe
Florida.
In 1984, this all changed
for me when I witnessed an underdog Georgia Tech team come into Athens,
soundly defeat my Bulldogs, and tear up Sanford Stadium's hedges
afterwards. The next day, on
the cover of the sports section of The Atlanta Journal-Constitution,
Tech coach Bill Curry was pictured loving on John Dewberry, a transfer from
Georgia two years earlier. Worse, Dewberry, the winning quarterback of the Yellow Jackets,
had torn off a piece of our beloved hedges.
This
exhibition of disrespect will not be accepted, I decided then. No longer did I
feel sorry for our intrastate rival; I felt hatred.
However, there is
one, and only one, single issue I do side with our in-state adversary. Most
Tech and Georgia football fans are familiar with this controversy and the pair
of asterisks that have made it renowned. If you're
NOT familiar with the dispute, I'm sure you'll hear about it this Saturday when watching the 107th, or 105th meeting between Georgia and Georgia Tech; the game's
television broadcast mentions it annually without fail.
The Bulldogs and
Yellow Jackets cannot agree on how many times they've played one another in
football. Georgia defends a 62-37-5 advantage; Georgia Tech claims a 39-62-5
disadvantage.
The disagreement
lies with the games played between the teams in 1943 and 1944 – both blowout
wins for the Yellow Jackets by a combined 92-0 score. Georgia Tech counts the
two games, while Georgia does not recognize them in the series results.
By the start of
the 1943 football season, World War II was raging. Because of the war,
graduation, and injuries, every one of the Bulldogs' lettermen from the
1942 national championship squad was lost. Of the 38 "men" on Georgia's 1943 roster, 30 were only 16 or 17 years old and too young for the war's draft. The few remaining players of 18 years and older were only part of the team because they had not met the military's physical standards.
Many of the teams
around the country were in the same predicament as Georgia and a good number of
schools cancelled their '43 football campaigns. Only a day before the Bulldogs'
season opener, Coach Wally Butts asked his boys if they too wanted to cancel their
season. They refused, joining only three other SEC schools of the 12 total
members, who decided to field a football team in 1943.
"So we'll play
football as long as 11 men are available to put a team on the field," said
Butts.
Like Georgia, rival Georgia Tech was
one of the four participating schools in the conference. However, unlike the Bulldogs, the Yellow
Jackets were prospering from the war.
As did a few other schools, Georgia Tech benefited from its on-campus Navy V-12 Program, whereas any student who signed up
for the program could remain in school and continue playing athletics. In addition, Tech had a Navy flight school which
drew students, including football players, from other universities.
In 1943, not only
did the Yellow Jackets return most of their team from the year before but,
according to Dan Magill – a long-time member of UGA's athletics department – Tech's squad was also joined by the captains of Alabama and Vanderbilt and other players
from various schools. This gave the Jackets an overwhelming advantage over Georgia and it was evident on
the gridiron with a 48-0 victory in 1943 and a 44-0 win in 1944.
Soon after his
hiring as publicity director of UGA football in 1948, Magill told Coach Butts he
would no longer count the 1943 and 1944 games in the series record between Tech
and Georgia. In the school's football records, Magill placed asterisks next to the two
Bulldog losses because "those were not true Georgia Tech teams," Magill has personally told
me before and countless others for decades.
"There's no
question about it, there's no way they are true Georgia-Georgia Tech games,"
Magill said. "There's no question about that. [Georgia] had a freshman
team."
Unfortunately, this is where I am
in disagreement and admittedly side with the enemy.
First off, that freshman
team for Georgia in 1943 reached as high as No. 20 nationally in the AP Poll during
the season. Entering the Georgia Tech game the following year, the Bulldogs
were actually recognized as only a slight underdog; some local bookies even placed even odds on the
game.
Above all, I have a feeling if Georgia would have been victorious in one or both of
the '43 and '44 contests, the games would be recognized today in the series results and there would be
no asterisks.
Both the NCAA and
SEC acknowledges the two games as losses for the Bulldogs. And, actually Georgia
also recognizes the losses in its yearly results and all-time record (just not
in the series results).
Coach Curry, will you accept this rose, err, I mean, piece of hedge?
Soon after the
beginning of the controversy, few stood by Magill on
his stance or took his asterisks seriously. Three years
following Magill's debatable decision, the Athens Banner-Herald
recognized the '43 and '44 games, announcing the 1951 Georgia-Georgia Tech contest as
the "46th Annual Battle," not the 44th. Magill's statement during the late-50s of
"Henceforth our records will refer to those 1943 and 1944 games as Georgia
versus the Georgia Tech Navy" was countered by sportswriter Furman Bisher with the following:
That being the
case, Louisiana State, Wake Forest and Daniel Field, three other teams that
defeated Georgia those two years, are expected to be notified in due time that
their victories have been revoked.
Let me add, although Georgia basically had an all-freshman team during those two
seasons while Georgia Tech was supported by a Navy program and a few players
from other schools, Coach Butts had asked his young team if they wanted to participate,
and they agreed to play the '43 season, including against Georgia Tech. They
consented to do so with knowledge of the circumstances and what the consequences might
be.
"I asked [the 1943
team] frankly if they wanted to pay the price in defeats they'll have to take,"
said Butts.
There were actually very
few "bona fide" college football squads from the 1943 and 1944 seasons. Should all of the remaining "non-true" programs revoke their results from the two
seasons? If the Bulldogs were not a "true" team in '43 and '44, should they
discount the 13 combined victories they achieved those seasons?
In its early
years, Georgia played several athletic clubs featuring former college players
and even a preparatory school or two; all of these games are recognized in UGA
football's yearly and series results, although they do not seem to be
"true" opposition.
In 1907, Georgia
played against Georgia Tech with at least four "ringers" – former collegiate or
professional players from the North – who were paid for their services. Because
of this illegal action, Georgia's head coach would eventually be banned from
coaching in the South forever. The result of the game, a 10-6 Georgia loss, is
acknowledged in UGA's yearly and series results.
In the first
Georgia-Georgia Tech football game of 1893, the Red and Black played a professionally
paid trainer at halfback, while three of Tech's five touchdowns were scored by a
28-year-old doctor in the U.S. Army. In addition, the umpire of the game, who
made several controversial calls in favor of Georgia Tech, was the brother of
Tech's trainer. This 28-6 Georgia Tech victory is also recognized by
Georgia.
In more support of
identifying the 1943 and 1944 as true games, I believe author Bill
Cromartie put it best in his book on the Georgia-Georgia Tech football rivalry,
Clean Old-Fashioned Hate:
If the games
are not official, then the University [of Georgia] boys who got their teeth
kicked in (so to speak), played the games for nothing. They would, most likely,
want them to count.
I personally know Dan Magill
well. Among other things, he is the greatest NCAA tennis coach of all time, the foremost
knowledgeable historian of UGA sports, has probably done more for UGA athletics
than anyone ever has, and is a wonderful and kind individual. However, and I say
this with the utmost respect, I totally disagree with his decision from more
than six decades ago regarding the 1943-1944 Georgia-Georgia Tech games – a decision he still
vehemently stands behind today.
During the time of
Magill's 1948 ruling, unlike when I was growing up, no Georgia football fan felt
sympathy for Georgia Tech, just hate. I suspect part of the decision by
"Dangerous Dan," as Bisher tagged him in 1957, was because of this hatred for
Georgia's chief rival of the time.
Nevertheless,
Magill's judgement and asterisks will remain in the UGA football record books
forever, whether I, the Yellow Jacket faithful, or anyone else likes it or not. Personally, I have and can certainly continue to live with the Bulldogs having two less losses to the Jackets, especially if (and God forbid), as was the case when Magill made his determination, Georgia football was to ever falter while the Eternal Enemy prospered. Of course, I don't see that happening anytime soon...